Jul. 20–What investors want, investors should get.
So it goes at The St. Paul Cos., more now under the regime of CEO Jay Fishman than in the past.
Fishman’s chief investment officer, William Heyman, puts it bluntly.
“Our ultimate paymaster,” he explains, “is Wall Street.”
This laser-like focus on what the Street wants has significant implications for the Twin Cities’ biggest venture capital operation, St. Paul Venture Capital.
A week ago, we reported how St. Paul Venture has been working its way through the wreckage of the tech stock crash.
But that’s only part of the story.
The other part is that The St. Paul, which has staked the venture firm to $2.9 billion in six funds since establishing it 15 years ago, has thoroughly reviewed its unusually large stake in the venture business. In the future, it will no longer be St. Paul Venture’s only funder.
Thus, for the first time ever, St. Paul Venture’s partners are getting educated on how to raise money from many places instead of relying on a sole benefactor.
Most venture firms have been hitting the pavement all along, to find capital from a variety of big institutional investors. St. Paul Venture’s funding arrangement has been an exception to the rule.
The St. Paul Cos. is not walking away from St. Paul Venture.
The venture firm has invested only 35 percent of its sixth fund, which at $1.3 billion ranks as by far the biggest of the six. Michael Gorman, co-managing partner at the venture firm, says it could be making new investments from the sixth fund until the end of 2005 and potentially into 2006. It expects to tap the fund all the way up to 2010, to pump more money into the companies it has already invested in.
But for venture capitalists, raising money appears certain to be a much longer process in the foreseeable future than it was in the dot-com era. So Gorman and his partners probably need to be ready to hit the streets for Fund VII by the end of next year.
Gorman says St. Paul Cos. will be a “substantial investor” in Fund VII, meaning that the insurer “will remain an important investor for at least 10 more years.”
Heyman confirms that the company intends to invest in Fund VII.
He expects the company to meet its commitments to Fund VI, subject to certain provisions. And he says St. Paul Cos. will help St. Paul Venture make the transition to the new fund.
Soon after Heyman arrived at The St. Paul 15 months ago, he began acting on his belief that the company’s $22 billion investment portfolio was much too exposed to equities — venture capital investments and publicly held stocks.
Then, one of the insurer’s key financial measures — the portion of its total shareholder equity that’s invested in stocks — was 39 percent. Heyman says that’s well beyond the comfort zone for the kinds of investors most likely to buy St. Paul Cos. stock. They prefer to see a greater portion of the company’s portfolio in fixed-income investments, mainly government-issued securities and corporate bonds.
Since spring of last year, the company has whittled that 39 percent number down to 14 percent.
Heyman says venture investments tend to be illiquid. The St. Paul’s stockholders want interest income from bonds more than capital gains offered by venture firms, he adds, and venture returns are “lumpy.” A look at the management discussion and analysis section of The St Paul’s latest annual report suggests just how lumpy.
In 2000, The St. Paul realized a gain of $554 million from its venture investments — 89 percent of its total property liability investment portfolio gain that year. But in 2001, the company realized a loss of $43 million from venture investments.
Last year, the loss ballooned to $200 million — enough to put the portfolio in the red for the year. Liquidations of some investments in St. Paul Venture’s portfolio, writedowns of some of its other investments and sales of venture investment partnerships accounted for the losses.
Such has been the scene across the venture landscape ever since the tech bubble popped.
This year, unlike 2002, St. Paul Venture has benefited from two lucrative cash-outs.
In January, it chalked up a $30 million gain when Cognos Corp. acquired Adaytum Software in Bloomington.
In May, the venture firm gained $80 million from a secondary offering of stock in publicly traded Select Comfort. St. Paul Venture still holds a $130 million stake in Select Comfort.
Heyman says the partners at St. Paul Venture are competent. It’s not a question of their performance, but rather of what kinds of assets are most appropriate to loom large in the St. Paul Cos. portfolio.
Buddy Ruvelson, the longtime St. Paul investor who is the dean of Minnesota’s venture capitalists, is not surprised.
“Venture capital is very cyclical for any investor,” says Ruvelson, “and for insurers, it can be very risky.
“Venture capital can be feast or famine. It lacks predictability. Fishman and Heyman are non-nonsense guys and they want to be able to produce predictable growth in earnings per share.”
Dave Beal can be reached at dbeal@pioneerpress.com or 651-228-5429.
—–
To see more of the Saint Paul Pioneer Press, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress.
(c) 2003, Saint Paul Pioneer Press, Minn. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News.
SPC, COGN,