{"id":1948,"date":"2003-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-12-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T04:00:00","slug":"sale-just-one-option-for-strong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/12\/2003\/sale-just-one-option-for-strong.html","title":{"rendered":"Sale just one option for Strong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sale just one option for Strong<\/p>\n<p>  Views on divestiture diverge<\/p>\n<p>  By KATHLEEN GALLAGHER AND DAVE UMHOEFER kgallagher@journalsentinel.com<\/p>\n<p>  Thursday, December 11, 2003<\/p>\n<p>  A Strong Financial Corp. executive left open the possibility that company founder Richard S. Strong might decide not to sell the firm or might sell only part of it.<\/p>\n<p>  At a meeting Wednesday of the Milwaukee County Pension Board, F. John Baranko, managing director of Strong&#8217;s institutional business at Strong Capital Management, emphasized that a sale is just one  of Richard Strong&#8217;s options.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;He could ultimately decide not to sell and just retain the ownership of the organization, and not have his influence,&#8221; Baranko said.<\/p>\n<p>  Baranko was reacting to a comment by Kellie Scheurell, the board&#8217;s investment consultant, who said Strong is giving up voting power and will be giving up his financial ownership of the firm. Strong  owns about 90% of the firm.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;They are in the process of divesting his ownership fully &#8212; that&#8217;s what Goldman (Sachs) was retained to do,&#8221; said Scheurell, of Mercer Investment Consulting, when Baranko interrupted to correct  her.<\/p>\n<p>  The board oversees the $1.4 billion Milwaukee County employee pension fund and has been meeting with Strong every month to monitor its $121.5 million fixed-income account with the firm.<\/p>\n<p>  The conflicting interpretations are a result of language in Strong&#8217;s original announcement that leaves open many possibilities for what form his divestiture will take and how it will be timed. The  release said Strong would take steps &#8220;to divest himself of voting control of the firm.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>  Observers have speculated that potential buyers could range from big banks to big mutual fund companies to a management group at the company.<\/p>\n<p>  No charges have been filed against Richard Strong or the firm, but three regulators &#8212; the Securities and Exchange Commission, the New York attorney general and the Wisconsin Department of  Financial Institutions &#8212; are investigating possible improper trading.<\/p>\n<p>  Strong, which manages about $40 billion of investor assets, has lost nearly $3 billion since Sept. 3, when New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer first implicated the firm for giving a New Jersey  hedge fund special opportunities to trade in certain Strong funds.<\/p>\n<p>  On Oct. 29, Spitzer&#8217;s office said it planned to take action against Strong personally, based on allegations of improper short- term trading of his company&#8217;s mutual funds.<\/p>\n<p>  What is not known is what influence the three regulators investigating Strong might have in determining what happens to the company. Juanita Scarlet, a Spitzer spokeswoman, declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p>  The company might be difficult to sell because of the allegations raised against it.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;Obviously they are on the block, but there aren&#8217;t many cases where people come in and buy a company in this position,&#8221; said Russel J. Kinnel, head of equity research at Morningstar Inc. in  Chicago.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;If Strong had gone on the market a year ago, without doubt they would have had no problem attracting some decent bids. But at this point, I don&#8217;t know. It may be that most bidders would want a  settlement so that the regulatory issues are behind them before they step in.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>  Last month, Milwaukee County Pension Board member Charles McDowell helped lead an unsuccessful effort to drop Strong until the regulatory cloud lifted.<\/p>\n<p>  The board took no formal action Wednesday after hearing that Strong&#8217;s investment performance was keeping pace. The fixed income assets Strong manages for the county are up 3.9% for the year, well  ahead of the benchmark they compete against.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;Your portfolio is secure and well represented,&#8221; Scheurell said.<\/p>\n<p>  Board members expressed concern that a sale of Strong or the addition of a &#8220;strategic partner&#8221; could break up the team that manages the county&#8217;s pension fund.<\/p>\n<p>  An ownership change would be a concern if Strong were integrated into another fixed-income company and its investment teams were broken apart, Scheurell said.<\/p>\n<p>  If there is no sale, company officials might take on ownership, which could help retain key employees, she said.<\/p>\n<p>  Board member Clifford Van Beek asked Baranko about a comment by Don Phillips of Morningstar suggesting that Strong Financial is leaving the door open for Strong&#8217;s return if he is exonerated.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;That&#8217;s speculation,&#8221; Baranko said. &#8220;Everything I&#8217;ve seen is a complete break.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>  Van Beek has strongly urged the board not to dump Strong, noting its good performance, local ties and fears that a pullout could help destroy the company.<\/p>\n<p>  Pension Board Chairman Walter Lanier asked that Kenneth J. Wessels, who is replacing Strong as chairman and chief executive, report to the Pension Board at its next meeting.<\/p>\n<p>  Paul Gores of the Journal Sentinel staff contributed to this report.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sale just one option for Strong Views on divestiture diverge By KATHLEEN GALLAGHER AND DAVE UMHOEFER kgallagher@journalsentinel.com Thursday, December 11, 2003 A Strong Financial Corp. executive left open the possibility that company founder Richard S. Strong might decide not to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hedgeco-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hedgeco.net\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}